TL;DR
Turn your wind-down time into listening time
- Thousands of audiobooks, podcasts and originals
- Listen on your phone, tablet or Echo — also offline
- Cancel anytime
A Sixty and Me report draws on interviews with people who experienced loss and hardship to identify three skills for living well through adversity: recognizing potential, making choices about how to respond, and finding purpose. The article presents these as learnable approaches, not guarantees of happiness or a substitute for support.
Sixty and Me has published a report identifying potential, choice and purpose as three skills that can help people live through hardship and loss. The article draws on interviews with people facing varied challenges and argues that resilience can be developed, rather than treated as a fixed personal trait.
The report’s author says the project began with interviews intended to learn how people coped with difficult experiences. The accounts later informed the book Living Well Despite Adversity: Inspiration for Finding Renewed, Meaning, and Joy in Your Life. The source does not describe a formal research study or specify how interviewees were selected, so the findings are presented as observations and personal accounts rather than population-level evidence.
The first skill, potential, means questioning assumptions about what remains possible after a major change. The article uses Gabriel Gordell’s experience as an example: he traveled 3,000 miles in 99 days in a manual wheelchair. Gordell is quoted as saying, “It never crossed my mind that being in a wheelchair is bigger than me as a person.”
The second skill is choice: while people cannot always control what happens to them, the report says they may have choices in how they respond. Sherri Mandell, discussing the murder of her son, Koby, describes deciding to keep living and to accept that grief had changed her. The third skill is purpose—finding meaning or a reason to move forward after a loss or life disruption. Julia Fox Garrison, who experienced a near-fatal stroke at 37, is quoted: “What I need to do is impact someone in a positive way every single day.”
Three Ways to Respond to Hardship
The report offers readers a practical framework for thinking about hardship without suggesting that suffering can be overcome by attitude alone. Its focus is on areas a person may be able to influence: how they understand their capabilities, the response they choose, and the sources of meaning they build or rediscover. Those ideas may be useful during loss, illness, disability or other disruptions, though individual circumstances differ.
The framing also pushes back on the idea that happiness simply rises and falls in line with external events. The source attributes to psychologist Sonja Lyubomirsky a model in which circumstances account for 10% of a “pie of happiness,” while genetics account for 50% and intentional behavior, attitudes and beliefs for 40%. The article does not provide a direct citation or methodological detail for those figures. They should be read as a claim reported by Sixty and Me, not as a settled measurement of any one person’s wellbeing.
For readers, the distinction matters: recognizing possible choices is not the same as blaming people for pain they did not choose. The report acknowledges that adversity can cause grief and suffering; its message is that people may still develop ways of responding and sources of purpose over time.
Popular right now
Dyson V8 Cyclone Cordless Vacuum
TCL QM64L 85-Inch QD-Mini LED 4K Smart Fire TV
Ninja Foodi 10-Qt DualZone Smart XL Air Fryer, 6-in-1, DZ550
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
From Interviews to Resilience Skills
The report grew from its author’s interest in how people continue their lives after challenges and losses. Interviewees shared personal accounts of pain, healing and renewal, and those accounts became the basis for the author’s book. The article treats their experiences as illustrations of resilience rather than proof that everyone will respond to hardship in the same way.
Its broader premise is that resilience can be learned and strengthened. The author compares it to a muscle that can grow with use and says people can build strength over time. The material supplied does not identify specific studies supporting that claim or explain which exercises or interventions were tested. It also does not define a clinical measure of resilience.
The three skills are described in everyday terms. Potential is linked to flexible thinking and problem-solving; choice to deciding how to respond when circumstances cannot be changed; and purpose to finding a meaningful direction through transitions and loss. The report does not claim that these approaches remove hardship or produce a particular outcome.
“It never crossed my mind that being in a wheelchair is bigger than me as a person.”
— Gabriel Gordell, as quoted in the Sixty and Me report
Limits of the Report’s Evidence
The source is a personal report based on interviews, not a clinical trial or systematic review. It does not state the number of people interviewed, provide a method for selecting them, or report outcomes that would show how often the three skills help. The examples illustrate individual experiences and cannot establish that the same approach will work for everyone.
The article also gives no publication date in the supplied material and does not provide a direct reference for the happiness percentages attributed to Lyubomirsky. It remains unclear how those figures were derived or how they apply across different people and circumstances. The report does not claim that potential, choice or purpose can prevent grief, replace practical assistance, or resolve the causes of adversity.
Applying the Ideas Over Time
The report does not announce a follow-up study, program or other next milestone. It closes by inviting readers to reflect on what helps them live through challenges, whether they believe they can build a rich life alongside pain, and how they are strengthening resilience.
For readers interested in the framework, the next step described in the article is personal reflection: identify what remains possible, consider responses within one’s control, and look for sources of meaning. These are suggestions from the report, not a prescribed treatment plan. How useful they are will depend on each person’s situation and support needs.
Key Questions
What three skills does the report identify?
Sixty and Me names potential, choice and purpose. The article links them to seeing possibilities, choosing how to respond where possible, and finding meaning through hardship.
Is the article based on a scientific study?
The supplied source describes interviews and the author’s observations. It does not provide details of a formal study, such as participant numbers or methods, so its examples should not be treated as population-level research findings.
Does the report say people can control their circumstances?
No. It acknowledges that people face circumstances they did not choose. Its argument is that some may have choices about how they respond, while recognizing that those choices do not erase hardship.
What does the report say about resilience?
The author describes resilience as a skill set that can be developed rather than a fixed trait. The supplied material does not specify a tested method or guarantee that building resilience will lead to a particular outcome.
Source: sixtyandme.com
